Foster Care

Professor Pastrana

English 1-20

September 28, 2009

Care, love, nurturing, and nothing more

As we turn and learn, the only people we truly trust are our family. Our family is so-called to teach, love, and nurture us; they should provide us with safety and care. When a father carries all these attributes, why should anyone second-guess his authority in his childrens lives? Richard Wexlers article Panic in Foster Care, says, Gerardo R. was a loving father who always cared for his children, but when his divorced wife lost delay of the children, Gerardo R. did not win custody both because of insufficient housing conditions.(A27) I do not condition with the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family services decision in Gerardo Rs case that income should plant whether the parent is fit to raise his children.

Society has been evolving and changing for centuries, but who would afford thought children would be taken from their throw parents for no ethical reason? Gerardo R. was denied not only custody but also the right to read his children. He was a normal American who worked hard but apparently it was not sufficient enough to gain custody of his children.



What truly determines whether a father is capable for providing his children with basic necessities? In my opinion, if the father has a home, job, and can provide his children with love, then what more is needed? Gerardo should have received legal custody of his children or at least(prenominal) the opportunity to communicate with them. He did not abuse or neglect his children, so why did they deny his right to see or talk to his children? Although this article does not go into across-the-board detail, the obvious points

Jreisat 2 tell the lecturer that the only reason he was denied his...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.